Original Research

A blatant disregard of Section 6 (1) of the Constitution of South Africa by higher education institutions and language authorities: An onomastic discrepancy

Tebogo J. Rakgogo, Evangeline B. Zungu
Literator | Vol 43, No 1 | a1814 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v43i1.1814 | © 2022 Tebogo J. Rakgogo, Evangeline B. Zungu | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 06 July 2021 | Published: 28 February 2022

About the author(s)

Tebogo J. Rakgogo, Department of Applied Languages, Faculty of Humanities, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
Evangeline B. Zungu, Department of African Languages, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

The primary focus of this article is the onomastic discrepancies that are considered a blatant disregard of Section 6 (1) of the Constitution of South Africa (Act No. 108 of 1996). The article employs a qualitative research approach where text analysis is used, focusing on constitutional documentation, legislative frameworks on language-related matters and higher education policy documentations, as well as language policy documentation from the selected 10 South African universities that offered Sepedi as a first language or conversational module. It is found that there is a constitutional disregard by competent organisations such as universities, financial institutions, Google and language authorities (such as Pan South African Language Board, Sesotho sa Leboa National Language Body and Sesotho sa Leboa National Lexicography Unit), since most of the policies are inconsistent with Section 6 (1) of the South African Constitution, 1996. In summary, the article records that the policies supersede the Constitution, since the language name ‘Northern Sotho/Sesotho sa Leboa’ is the most used name to refer to the official standard language rather than its counterpart, Sepedi.

Keywords

onomastic discrepancy; sociolinguistics; language planning; dialect; official standard language; Constitution; higher education institutions and policy deviation

Metrics

Total abstract views: 4307
Total article views: 5909

 

Crossref Citations

1. Onomastic Controversy on Sepedi and Northern Sotho/Sesotho sa Leboa Language Names: A Forensic Linguistic Perspective
Tebogo Jacob Rakgogo
E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  first page: 2001  year: 2024  
doi: 10.38159/ehass.202451129

2. Neither Sepedi nor Northern Sotho/Sesotho sa Leboa is onomastically correct: a colonial imposition
Tebogo J. Rakgogo
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies  vol: 42  issue: sup1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.2989/16073614.2024.2351890

3. Lexical similarities between Khelobedu dialect and Tshivenḓa and Sepedi languages
Tebogo J. Rakgogo, Itani P. Mandende
Literator  vol: 44  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.4102/lit.v44i1.1910

4. Is Khelobedu a language or a dialect?
Tebogo Jacob Rakgogo, Itani Peter Mandende
South African Journal of African Languages  vol: 42  issue: 2  first page: 179  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1080/02572117.2022.2094049

5. A Bibliometric Analysis of Language Legislation Research From 2005 to 2023
Chen Zhang, Ronghui Zhao, Yan Huang
Sage Open  vol: 15  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1177/21582440241299614

6. A critical examination of the socio-onomastic controversy of Sepedi and Sesotho sa Leboa/Northern Sotho language names and the role and effectiveness of the Commission for Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities
Tebogo J Rakgogo
South African Journal of African Languages  first page: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/02572117.2024.2429962

7. The voice of a people: Exploring language and ethnicity among the amaBhaca in uMzimkhulu and KwaBhaca
Yanga LP Majola, Evangeline B Zungu
South African Journal of African Languages  first page: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/02572117.2025.2466432